Tuesday, September 23, 2014
Cleaning out
Sometimes, you have to just clean out the crap that's dragging you down, whether it's people, or things.
Thursday, September 18, 2014
Workin' hard
So, I've been thinking about what it will take to go back to school and get my nursing degree. On the one hand, it seems like a really good idea. Nursing, then possibly a midwife degree is a really stable career, especially here in Utah, and the pay and benefits are certainly better than what one can make in the arts. I love the arts and it would be so hard to give that up, but raising a child alone isn't easy financially and it will only get more expensive.
On the other hand, when I consider how much work will be involved, it worries me. I have a little daughter. She needs me and my time. Will going to school take too much time away from her? Will I even be able to get into nursing school? What if I don't? I have a year's worth of pre-reqs to do before I can even apply for nursing school and that would mean quitting my job and taking out loans in order to do that, and then if I didn't get into nursing school after that? Then what? I would have a significant amount of money in loans and no way to pay them off. I wouldn't have a job, I wouldn't have a way to support myself or my daughter.
It's scary, y'all. I know I would be a good nurse, I know I would do well in school. Even though my degree is in the arts, I've always had a penchant for science. But, I'm not so young anymore. I don't have any healthcare experience, I already have a degree and I graduated from college the first time nearly 20 years ago. What would possess them to accept me to nursing school? It isn't easy to get in.
Do I dare risk my stable, albeit not well paying job to take out major loans for something that may not work out? It was different when I was young and going to college the first time. Then, I was young and unattached with no obligations except to myself. And being young, I had a hell of a lot more energy than I do now. I worked 2 jobs and went to school full time, paid for my schooling, had a scholarship and didn't take out any loans. That won't be the case this time. If I'm going to nursing school full time, I won't be able to work, because I will be in school all day and I need to be home with my wee lass at night. Well, and I want to be home with her. So, that means loans for tuition and loans for living expenses.
Now, I know how to be poor, I know how to live cheaply, but it isn't easy, and it's very stressful. And I'm looking at 3 years here, at the least, before I'm a nurse, and then two more years if I want to be a midwife.
I don't know. It's discouraging. On the one hand, I really want to do it. It would be nice to have a well paying career, a very stable job, doing something I enjoy doing, helping others and getting paid to do it. On the other hand, it's such a risk, and if it fails, I am screwed. Ugh.
On the other hand, when I consider how much work will be involved, it worries me. I have a little daughter. She needs me and my time. Will going to school take too much time away from her? Will I even be able to get into nursing school? What if I don't? I have a year's worth of pre-reqs to do before I can even apply for nursing school and that would mean quitting my job and taking out loans in order to do that, and then if I didn't get into nursing school after that? Then what? I would have a significant amount of money in loans and no way to pay them off. I wouldn't have a job, I wouldn't have a way to support myself or my daughter.
It's scary, y'all. I know I would be a good nurse, I know I would do well in school. Even though my degree is in the arts, I've always had a penchant for science. But, I'm not so young anymore. I don't have any healthcare experience, I already have a degree and I graduated from college the first time nearly 20 years ago. What would possess them to accept me to nursing school? It isn't easy to get in.
Do I dare risk my stable, albeit not well paying job to take out major loans for something that may not work out? It was different when I was young and going to college the first time. Then, I was young and unattached with no obligations except to myself. And being young, I had a hell of a lot more energy than I do now. I worked 2 jobs and went to school full time, paid for my schooling, had a scholarship and didn't take out any loans. That won't be the case this time. If I'm going to nursing school full time, I won't be able to work, because I will be in school all day and I need to be home with my wee lass at night. Well, and I want to be home with her. So, that means loans for tuition and loans for living expenses.
Now, I know how to be poor, I know how to live cheaply, but it isn't easy, and it's very stressful. And I'm looking at 3 years here, at the least, before I'm a nurse, and then two more years if I want to be a midwife.
I don't know. It's discouraging. On the one hand, I really want to do it. It would be nice to have a well paying career, a very stable job, doing something I enjoy doing, helping others and getting paid to do it. On the other hand, it's such a risk, and if it fails, I am screwed. Ugh.
Sunday, September 14, 2014
Relationships and Wherefores
I've had some interesting conversations with a few people lately about relationships and why they are or aren't important. I think it just depends on one's viewpoint, really, about what makes something important, or why it might be important.
So, here's some perspectives.
I am the sort of person who cares about others, sometimes to my detriment. I tend to forgo things that I want for myself, things I want to do, places I want to visit, etc, if someone needs me or needs what I have. This is not always a good thing, because it often means I say yes to things I shouldn't, wind up with my plate far too full and unable to do my best at the things I should. It also means I often don't get what I want or what I deserve. And, human nature being what it is, people tend to take advantage of that. But, I can't help it. I care about people, I want to help if I can. I need to help if I can.
I dated a man who also cares deeply for people. His career is basically finding ways to make it easier to care for people (he studies Health Economics). He is politically and socially active in caring for people. He writes and researches and publishes new ways to make it easier and more efficient to care for people.
We share a lot in common, this way, caring for and about other people, in a way that takes up much of our time. But, we differ greatly in one very specific way when it comes to this.
The way I care for people is on an individual basis. I make the most difference that way. I am invested in the relationships I have with people, because I care for people. That is where I choose to spend my effort, on the individual. So, relationships are important to me.
For him, the good of the many outweighs the good of the one. He feels he makes the most difference being invested in the research and the projects and the publishing and teaching that he does. And, he's likely right. But, what it means for him is that relationships aren't the important thing. They take time away from the important thing.
But, I don't consider relationships important just because of the effect that I can have on others, they are important for me, as well. I enjoy them, I like having friends, I enjoy having a significant other, I like the benefits I gain from them, and I'm willing to put a great deal of effort into those that I think will go somewhere, or be something. It's vital to me to have these relationships, because of what they do for me. Of course, I think the benefit is mutual...
He considers relationships of this sort to be a luxury. And perhaps he is right. A real relationship requires time and effort and sacrifice. Having a relationship like that means that time is taken from elsewhere to foster it, which means that some of the things that he does to try and help others wouldn't get done. In order to have meaningful relationships, he would have to cut back on the other stuff that he does.
But, is it selfish? I'm in many of the relationships/friendships that I am in because they are beneficial or enjoyable to ME. If they stopped being that way, I would stop being in them. I put out the effort that I do because the payoff for ME is very good, although it is for the other party as well, I think.
So, are relationships a luxury? Are they selfish? If they take one away from doing good on a grander scale, but they are more enjoyable, is that selfish?
Why are relationships important?
So, here's some perspectives.
I am the sort of person who cares about others, sometimes to my detriment. I tend to forgo things that I want for myself, things I want to do, places I want to visit, etc, if someone needs me or needs what I have. This is not always a good thing, because it often means I say yes to things I shouldn't, wind up with my plate far too full and unable to do my best at the things I should. It also means I often don't get what I want or what I deserve. And, human nature being what it is, people tend to take advantage of that. But, I can't help it. I care about people, I want to help if I can. I need to help if I can.
I dated a man who also cares deeply for people. His career is basically finding ways to make it easier to care for people (he studies Health Economics). He is politically and socially active in caring for people. He writes and researches and publishes new ways to make it easier and more efficient to care for people.
We share a lot in common, this way, caring for and about other people, in a way that takes up much of our time. But, we differ greatly in one very specific way when it comes to this.
The way I care for people is on an individual basis. I make the most difference that way. I am invested in the relationships I have with people, because I care for people. That is where I choose to spend my effort, on the individual. So, relationships are important to me.
For him, the good of the many outweighs the good of the one. He feels he makes the most difference being invested in the research and the projects and the publishing and teaching that he does. And, he's likely right. But, what it means for him is that relationships aren't the important thing. They take time away from the important thing.
But, I don't consider relationships important just because of the effect that I can have on others, they are important for me, as well. I enjoy them, I like having friends, I enjoy having a significant other, I like the benefits I gain from them, and I'm willing to put a great deal of effort into those that I think will go somewhere, or be something. It's vital to me to have these relationships, because of what they do for me. Of course, I think the benefit is mutual...
He considers relationships of this sort to be a luxury. And perhaps he is right. A real relationship requires time and effort and sacrifice. Having a relationship like that means that time is taken from elsewhere to foster it, which means that some of the things that he does to try and help others wouldn't get done. In order to have meaningful relationships, he would have to cut back on the other stuff that he does.
But, is it selfish? I'm in many of the relationships/friendships that I am in because they are beneficial or enjoyable to ME. If they stopped being that way, I would stop being in them. I put out the effort that I do because the payoff for ME is very good, although it is for the other party as well, I think.
So, are relationships a luxury? Are they selfish? If they take one away from doing good on a grander scale, but they are more enjoyable, is that selfish?
Why are relationships important?
Sunday, September 7, 2014
Happiness
My girl is home after being gone for three days with her dad. I don't like it when she is gone, it feels terribly empty.
I waited out on the sidewalk when I heard the truck coming down the street. She jumped out and ran to me, jumping into my arms to give me a giant hug and a kiss, with a "I had SO much fun, but I missed you, mamma!"
Yes, this is what happiness looks like. How lucky I am that she is mine.
I waited out on the sidewalk when I heard the truck coming down the street. She jumped out and ran to me, jumping into my arms to give me a giant hug and a kiss, with a "I had SO much fun, but I missed you, mamma!"
Yes, this is what happiness looks like. How lucky I am that she is mine.
Saturday, September 6, 2014
Why?
Why does asking why make people decide that I must not believe in the Gospel or in God or prophets? Since when are we supposed to be blind sheeple?
Monday, August 25, 2014
I've been thinking a lot about marriage lately and what makes a marriage work and what we are allowed to expect out of a marriage. And are my standards, wants, needs too high? Clearly, not everyone wants the same thing out of a marriage and partnership that I want. I look around me at some of my friends and acquaintances and I think, I could not do marriage that way. Except that I did, for 12 years. It didn't work. Not for me, anyway.
Now, clearly, I am not in the marriages that I see, but some of them are friends of mine so I do know some of the inner workings of their marriages. Not enough to make a fair judgement, but enough to make me curious how much more there is to it.
I had many people tell me that I was not justified in leaving my marriage. It's none of their business and they certainly aren't in a position to determine that for me. But, I can see that for some of them, some of the things that made me HAVE to leave are things that they would not consider that big of a deal. Things they can do without. Things that they think I have no right to expect and that aren't necessary for a marriage to be happy? Successful? Perhaps they are right.
But, what makes a marriage successful, then?
For me, it's one thing, really. Because this one thing parlays into all the other things that make a marriage work. It's intimacy. I require it. And, I don't just refer to physical/sexual intimacy, although, I think that can be a natural extension of the other types of intimacy, if one is in that type of relationship. By which I mean that friendships can be intimate as well, without physical/sexual intimacy.
So, what is intimacy? How does one achieve it? Is it that important to everybody?
I'll start with the last question. No, I don't think it is. I don't think everyone is interested in a deep level of intimacy with their partner, and I think there are a variety of reasons for this. Fear, lack of awareness, lack of desire to do the work required, to put in the time. I think fear and lack of awareness may be two of the most prevalent.
I once likened being intimate with someone to a castle. There are layers of defenses set up to protect ourselves, some concious, some unconcious and many quite necessary. There are things about ourselves, our divine spark, if you will, that are too precious to share with the common world, so we guard them, as we should. So, you can go to the extreme and keep everyone on the other side of the moat, drawbridge up, portcullis down. Or, you can back things off a bit. Leave the bridge down and allow people into the outer bailey. They can look and see and interact, but the spark is still well protected, as it should be. Then, there are those people you allow through to the inner bailey. Your close acquaintances, etc. They get a somewhat better vision of the real you, but you are still safe, because you don't know these people QUITE that well yet. There are those you allow into the outer keep, your bannermen, those who will stand by you in times of trouble, but have their own things to do when peace is in the land. They can recognize your need to retreat to a safe space and will defend it as they can. Finally, there is the inner keep. It's where you keep your treasures, your secrets, your SELF. The barest you. For some people, no one is allowed in here. It's too dangerous, because in your inner keep, you are unarmed, naked. Anyone that comes in there can hurt you. And so you are careful, you keep the door barred, your treasures safely guarded. This is not bad, unless you stay in your inner keep with the door permanently barred. Most of us don't, most of us wander down to the outer keep, the inner and outer bailey and even to the other side of the moat. But we don't do it unarmed or unprotected.
Being alone in the inner keep is lonely. But, it's also where you find yourself.
I think a lot of people never spend time in their inner keep. I think there are some people who don't even know there is an inner keep, not of their own, nor that others have one. And if you don't know it's there, you can't let anyone else in. If you can't see someone else's, you can't join them in it.
I want someone in my inner keep, but I want them to want to be there. I want them to earn their way in. I would have to trust them, because my inner keep is a reflection of me. It has areas full of light, and areas dark with shadow. I need someone to love the shadow as well as the light, if only for the contrast it gives. But, I am reluctant, because it is easy for someone to betray me in my keep. I am unarmed. I have been wounded there and left defenseless, open and raw.
But, I am also hopeful, because I have been loved there. I have had someone come in and tell me it is beautiful and mean it. Someone who wanted to spend time there, to admire and enjoy the warmth and beauty and to help drive away some of the shadow with their own spark when mine dims.
And this is a thing of beauty and something that I require, should I ever be inclined to marry again.
Now, clearly, I am not in the marriages that I see, but some of them are friends of mine so I do know some of the inner workings of their marriages. Not enough to make a fair judgement, but enough to make me curious how much more there is to it.
I had many people tell me that I was not justified in leaving my marriage. It's none of their business and they certainly aren't in a position to determine that for me. But, I can see that for some of them, some of the things that made me HAVE to leave are things that they would not consider that big of a deal. Things they can do without. Things that they think I have no right to expect and that aren't necessary for a marriage to be happy? Successful? Perhaps they are right.
But, what makes a marriage successful, then?
For me, it's one thing, really. Because this one thing parlays into all the other things that make a marriage work. It's intimacy. I require it. And, I don't just refer to physical/sexual intimacy, although, I think that can be a natural extension of the other types of intimacy, if one is in that type of relationship. By which I mean that friendships can be intimate as well, without physical/sexual intimacy.
So, what is intimacy? How does one achieve it? Is it that important to everybody?
I'll start with the last question. No, I don't think it is. I don't think everyone is interested in a deep level of intimacy with their partner, and I think there are a variety of reasons for this. Fear, lack of awareness, lack of desire to do the work required, to put in the time. I think fear and lack of awareness may be two of the most prevalent.
I once likened being intimate with someone to a castle. There are layers of defenses set up to protect ourselves, some concious, some unconcious and many quite necessary. There are things about ourselves, our divine spark, if you will, that are too precious to share with the common world, so we guard them, as we should. So, you can go to the extreme and keep everyone on the other side of the moat, drawbridge up, portcullis down. Or, you can back things off a bit. Leave the bridge down and allow people into the outer bailey. They can look and see and interact, but the spark is still well protected, as it should be. Then, there are those people you allow through to the inner bailey. Your close acquaintances, etc. They get a somewhat better vision of the real you, but you are still safe, because you don't know these people QUITE that well yet. There are those you allow into the outer keep, your bannermen, those who will stand by you in times of trouble, but have their own things to do when peace is in the land. They can recognize your need to retreat to a safe space and will defend it as they can. Finally, there is the inner keep. It's where you keep your treasures, your secrets, your SELF. The barest you. For some people, no one is allowed in here. It's too dangerous, because in your inner keep, you are unarmed, naked. Anyone that comes in there can hurt you. And so you are careful, you keep the door barred, your treasures safely guarded. This is not bad, unless you stay in your inner keep with the door permanently barred. Most of us don't, most of us wander down to the outer keep, the inner and outer bailey and even to the other side of the moat. But we don't do it unarmed or unprotected.
Being alone in the inner keep is lonely. But, it's also where you find yourself.
I think a lot of people never spend time in their inner keep. I think there are some people who don't even know there is an inner keep, not of their own, nor that others have one. And if you don't know it's there, you can't let anyone else in. If you can't see someone else's, you can't join them in it.
I want someone in my inner keep, but I want them to want to be there. I want them to earn their way in. I would have to trust them, because my inner keep is a reflection of me. It has areas full of light, and areas dark with shadow. I need someone to love the shadow as well as the light, if only for the contrast it gives. But, I am reluctant, because it is easy for someone to betray me in my keep. I am unarmed. I have been wounded there and left defenseless, open and raw.
But, I am also hopeful, because I have been loved there. I have had someone come in and tell me it is beautiful and mean it. Someone who wanted to spend time there, to admire and enjoy the warmth and beauty and to help drive away some of the shadow with their own spark when mine dims.
And this is a thing of beauty and something that I require, should I ever be inclined to marry again.
Sunday, August 24, 2014
Words matter
This quote made me think of someone I love. Someone who I think sometimes forgets about the poetry, in his noble efforts to sustain life. Poetry and passion are what make the life worth sustaining.
“We don't read and write poetry because it's cute. We read and write poetry because we are members of the human race. And the human race is filled with passion. So medicine, law, business, engineering... these are noble pursuits and necessary to sustain life. But poetry, beauty, romance, love... these are what we stay alive for.”
― N.H. Kleinbaum, Dead Poets Society
“We don't read and write poetry because it's cute. We read and write poetry because we are members of the human race. And the human race is filled with passion. So medicine, law, business, engineering... these are noble pursuits and necessary to sustain life. But poetry, beauty, romance, love... these are what we stay alive for.”
― N.H. Kleinbaum, Dead Poets Society
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
